🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.