🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved seats for Māori representatives on NZ councils will be cut by more than half, following a controversial legislative amendment that forced local governments to put the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which can include one or more elected officials based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to vote for a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments could only establish a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a public vote in their region. Communities frequently devoted considerable time building local support and pushing their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating communities should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a vital step in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to policies designed to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities mandated to hold referendums supported Māori wards, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are able to create different electoral districts – such as rural wards – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements applied to Indigenous representation suggested the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that chose to retain their seats.