🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your insights on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous women joined an organized professional network test recently after viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her audience decrease significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers experienced favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."